The EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 – A Review

Published: 17-May-2014

Cosmetic Science Technology: a review of the Regulation that replaced the EU Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC on 11 July 2013

You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.

Author: C. I. Betton B.Sc., FSB, C Biol, FIEMA, CEnv, FRSC, EUROTOX Registered Toxicologist, Delphic HSE Solutions Limited, Deepcut, Surrey, United Kingdom

The EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 was first seen as a Draft document in 2008 and was passed into Law in 2009, largely unchanged. The Regulation replaced the EU Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC and all of its amendments and harmonised the niggling differences in national legislation that had been introduced by the member states.  There was a phased introduction of the Law which came fully into effect on 11th July 2013.  This paper reviews the changes that the Regulation has brought about, not just in terms of what the new requirements actually are but also looks at the often quite fundamental changes that have occurred as a result in the way that the Industry has had to adapt – and is still adapting – to the new requirements.  It also discusses what lessons we, as safety assessors and Responsible Persons, have learned and which may be of interest to those affected across the globe; for be in no doubt, although this is an EU Regulation, the effects that it has had are global and with increasing harmonisation of legislation, may be a taste of things-to-come for cosmetics manufacturers and importers everywhere.

Immediate Effects

From the point of view of the safety assessor, the change in the legislation has reduced significantly the number of assessors that are available to do the work.  After the publication of the Regulation in 2009, many small to medium sized companies stopped doing their own assessments.  These typically used to be produced by the ‘Company Chemist’, a person who had a long working knowledge of the (often limited) product range and basically knew that a new product was similar to the old product and that had never been a problem.

On becoming aware of the scope of the Regulation, these people rightly recognised that their old approach was no longer acceptable and so the work would need to be sent to specialists.  This happened to such an extent that more work was being sent to smaller numbers of people.  It was also clear in the Regulation that any product on sale on July 11th 2013 would have to be compliant with the new requirements. Given that the lifespan of a cosmetic formulation can range from tens of years (think of some fine fragrances) to a matter of a week or so (some Halloween face paints for example), there was not an immediate rush to get all products assessed in line with the new requirements.  We as a company were still being asked at the beginning of 2013 for assessments to the old Directive for some products, whereas some major UK Retailers, knowing that their own branded products would have a longer life-span, began requesting assessments to the Regulation requirements in 2010.

Not yet a Subscriber?

This is a small extract of the full article which is available ONLY to premium content subscribers. Click below to get premium content on Cosmetics Business.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in here.

You may also like