The Estée Lauder Companies (ELC) is allegedly looking to sell three brands within its beauty portfolio – Dr. Jart+, Too Faced and Smashbox.
The trio of brands have sat within the beauty giant’s portfolio for many years, with Smashbox acquired by ELC in 2010, Too Faced in 2016, and a minority stake in Dr. Jart+ in 2015, and then remaining shares in 2019.
ELC is rumoured to be mulling the sale of all three brands in an alleged package deal estimated to be in the low nine figures, according to sources in a new report published by The Business of Fashion.
However, nothing has been confirmed, and Cosmetics Business has reached out to ELC for comment.
Although ELC does not break down the performance of each individual brand, Too Faced, and Dr. Jart+ were both identified last year as underperforming for the company in its annual results.
ELC is in the midst of its ongoing ‘Profit Recovery and Growth Plan’ (PGRP), which CEO Stéphane de La Faverie introduced in January 2025.
The strategy aims to boost flagging sales, and this includes cost-cutting measures such as consolidating its service providers, expanding outsourced services and standardising its “related end-to-end business processes”.
Slashing jobs has also been part of the plan, with 3,200 jobs cut so far and 3,800 more hanging in the balance.
In December, it was revealed exactly how much ELC has spent on this major restructuring of the business so far.
ELC’s beauty portfolio currently comprises Estée Lauder, Aramis, Clinique, Lab Series, Origins, MAC Cosmetics, La Mer, Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Aveda and Jo Malone London.
As well as Bumble & Bumble, Darphin Paris, Tom Ford, Smashbox, Aerin Beauty, Le Labo, Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, Kilian Paris, Too Faced, Dr. Jart+, Deciem and Balmain Beauty.
Related content:
- From Fenty Beauty to Rimmel London: Beauty brands which could find new owners in 2026
- Pat McGrath Labs seeks buyer as assets are put up for auction
- Cult nail brand Chillhouse acquired by Kiss Beauty Group to fuel growth
- Claire’s UK collapses again as owners declare no ‘realistic possibility of trading profitably’
- Analysis: Estée Lauder Companies’ underperforming brands amid portfolio review
- Analysis: What is LVMH doing right in luxury – and can the Sephora owner keep it up?