GEKA successfully defends its IP Rights and enforces them against design infringing products of a competitor to protect its customers’ business interests

Published: 1-May-2026

GEKA GmbH, a global manufacturer of cosmetic applicators and packaging, has successfully defended its IP Rights by overcoming an attempt to invalidate the Registered Design No. DE 402008004121-0009 (shown below), filed by a cosmetics brand against whom GEKA had enforced its Design Rights, in order to protect its customers by preventing their distribution of prohibited copies of its Exercised Applicator Design, lipDEFINER applicator

GEKA successfully defends its IP Rights and enforces them against design infringing  products of a competitor to protect its customers’ business interests

In October 2025, the Frankfurt District Court had ruled in favour of GEKA, by holding that the  attacked applicators –despite the fact that their designs are not fully identical to the  protected design– (See below images) create no different overall impression and therefore  fall within the scope of protection of GEKA’s registered design. Consequently GEKA was  granted the permanent injunction it had sought for, according to which, the defendant was  prohibited from using the design without GEKA’s consent and GEKA is entitled to claim for  damages. The judgement is final meanwhile, since the defendant withdrew the appeal that  had filed against the Court Decision.

GEKA successfully defends its IP Rights and enforces them against design infringing  products of a competitor to protect its customers’ business interests

GEKA successfully defends its IP Rights and enforces them against design infringing  products of a competitor to protect its customers’ business interests

In a further Decision issued on March 2026 and prompted by the defendant’s counter attack,  the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA) has also ruled in favor of GEKA confirming  the validity of the design right and that it enjoys at least a medium scope of protection due  to its distinctive features and unique character at the time of filing. This decision is also final. 

Both Decisions assume/confirm the validity of the design and give way for the evaluation that  the applicator design enjoys at least a medium scope of protection due to its distinctive  features and unique character at the time of filing.  

The decision of this case is of practical relevance since the concerned applicators were  acquired outside of EU and imported to and distributed in Germany by different established  cosmetics retailers, as part of cosmetic units filled with lip preparations as a brand product of  the defendant, which confirms the prohibition from offering, selling and distributing such  products falling within the scope of the design in German Territory, despite their origin or  primary market. 

GEKA and the defendant had an earlier legal dispute over another applicator and the same  German registered design, and in a settlement agreement the cosmetic brand had agreed to  stop selling the disputed applicator in Germany and to not sell applicators infringing the  Design in future. The Frankfurt Regional Court also decided that the sale of the mentioned applicators in Germany was a breach of the earlier settlement agreement.  

GEKA considers this an important victory and will continue to vigorously fight for its rights  and defend its entitlement to claim ownership over its proprietary well-known and unique appearing applicator, the LipDEFINER (Exercised Applicator Design, perspective view only,  shown below) which benefits from the recent judgement.

GEKA successfully defends its IP Rights and enforces them against design infringing  products of a competitor to protect its customers’ business interests

GEKA and the medmix group have previously enforced their rights in a significant number of  cases to protect their intellectual property and are more determined than ever to enforce  their IP-rights and to avail judicial help for that purpose, if necessary. This is a commitment  the medmix group has made – not least to protect its customers and users from copies made  by third parties that are not subject to GEKA’s rigorous testing and quality control and  therefore cannot be covered by its warranty.  
 

Trending Articles

  1. You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
    Click here to find out more.
  2. You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
    Click here to find out more.

Relevant companies

You may also like